I question very much many of the news media accounts of just about everything. I don't trust governments, media, or people in general let alone those in authority. In other words I trust no one and while it has it's detrimental side, I have been protected from following the crowd without questioning the reasons.
Covid-19 reporting is no different. I don't trust the reporting, and I don't trust the hype that has been promoted by government and media. The media have gone out of their way to find people who have had a rough go in dealing with covid-19 only to discover that there were other underlying issues that were only made worse with covid-19. The reality? The reality is that the numbers don't add up when it comes to reporting the pandemic.
The public is being manipulated my friends. They are being herded into one carrel and expected to obey without question what they are being told. Those who do not go in quietly are being forced to comply with the demands made upon them.
When the so called pandemic was first announced in the winter of 2019, it was considered nothing more than just another flue like problem. All of a sudden numbers were swelled up and made public and than in March of 2020 the world went into major lock down. While some politicians claiming this wouldn't be long, the federal leader as in trudeau, claimed with sincerity that this pandemic will not end until 2022, just in time for the next Canadian federal election.
How could trudeau be so sure that this would end in 2022? I still question was there a real need and purpose to lock down small businesses but allow box stores to remain open on the understanding that people were only buying what they needed as in food supplies. Nothing of the sort was really needed. Again, the public has been manipulated into obedience without questioning.
People have been told by this expert and that expert, by this scientist and that doctor, and yet you can search the internet to find so called professionals all over the map on this issue. With so many experts and doctors they too have to be funneled into the right corral. Anyone that doesn't fit into the mold being created, are vilified by the governments and media.
Fear has been the weapon of choice being used by governments and media alike. You can see the fear in the faces of the people wearing masks. They not only keep their distance from people, but they are paranoid of any physical contact. People obediently was down surfaces believing that they have made the area safe. For years we have been told that the hospitals are the perfect breeding grounds for bacteria of all sorts to develop because the surfaces have been sterilized and made clean. Now we are being told to do exactly the same as hospitals but not to understand that a cleaned surface is a breeding ground surface. Again the population is being controlled and herded into an area of total compliance without consideration about the reality.
Lately there were some very large gatherings where there were hundreds of people in close attendance with others. The media instantly jumped on the wagon and made predictions that these gatherings will bring an increase to those infected with the pandemic. So far it was been one, two, even four weeks since the first major issues were raised and no big increase in the amount of people infected. So is there something wrong here? Has the pandemic done something else? Where are all the infected people? Surely the house party of 200 people would have raised the numbers? But they haven't.
To make sure that the people will continue to be frightened, we are now being warned of; a) the virus is mutating. b) there is a second wave coming. c) report the numbers of infected, and not the numbers of those that had to be hospitalized. Each one of these warnings are conditional and not a for sure happening. It's the later issue that has made the news mostly. The constant reporting of so called new cases, and then adding those numbers to the existing cases, but not reporting how many actually had to be hospitalized, how many have recovered, and finally it has been discovered that many people have been falsely diagnosed as in a false negative or a false positive. So even now the testing is under suspicion but is being ignored.
The two best methods of testing for covid-19 is by a blood test and urine test combined. The swab up the nose is not accurate nor is the temperature gun being used at airports and other places. Both have been accepted but neither are absolute like the combined blood and urine testing.
The idea has become one of control. How best can the population be controlled by governments in order to bring about something more disturbing with in the confines of a one world order kind of thing. I am only pointing out some stuff so that people will think and not follow suit just because. People need to think and not trust governments who have been telling people for years that they know what is best for the people. No they don't know what is best because the philosophy games keep changing over and over again.
Never trust anyone, therefore you will never be disappointed
Friday, 31 July 2020
Wednesday, 29 July 2020
Tuesday, 28 July 2020
Friday, 24 July 2020
We can not use todays binoculars to look at the past .
Do we really know what is going on? Do we really understand what is happening? The answer I believe is no, we do not.
There is a lot of truth to the picture posted above. We really don't understand what white privilege is because we don't understand what white privilege is not. We look at white privilege as if all white kids grew up with silver spoons in their mouths. This is not the case. Middle class and below middle class Canadians have been in survival mode since the 1950s. The second world war was behind everyone for about five years and Canada like many other countries were in an economy that was growing because of the war. We were building a nation again, and we worked hard at doing so.
Canadians in the middle and lower classes were well aware of those who had it made. We wished we had their wealth, but reality soon brought us into place knowing that we would never be wealthy let alone live like the rich. We worked for everything we had and continued do work for everything we got, just to survive and enjoy life.
Today we are being told that we got to where we are because our skin is white. We are being told that we had it easy because our skin is white. Sociologists are attempting to make all white people, especially white males feel like they have been privileged just to be alive. They fail to realize and fail to look at what society really was like and about after World War Two.
I remember when Bob Rae was the premier of Ontario, there was a policy that white males need not apply for many government jobs. In fact the job postings actually said "white males need not apply". The idea of ethnic hiring for employment was created, based on the locality of the individual. What this meant was that employers were required to hire according to the ethnic percentage where the job was located. This created a problem in that many qualified people were being over looked just so a company could meet the quotas set before them.
Discrimination accusations went wild during this time, as everyone who felt they weren't given a chance filed complaints with the new Human Rights' Commission which was made up of human rights activists. These human rights violations were investigated and of course were biased towards the complainant. Some companies paid the fine and moved on while others were forced to hire the individual making the complaint and fire the newly hired person. This of course created a toxic work place and those who filed the complaints soon left the workplace.
The biggest problem today with white privilege is that we are looking back with binoculars that are tied to the present. We are holding people to a standard that just wasn't there. Judgements are being made of the past with today's understanding of issues. That is the rub.
The "cancel culture" which seeks to destroy the past by removing every reminder of the past from the present, fails to understand the history of the country and to what purpose these monuments are being made. The idea that if you destroy all references of the past, then people won't know about it and a new beginning can be created where everything is rosy and nice. This only opens the door to a people that have no idea who they are and are willing to accept anything that gives them some sort of identity.
This is not to say that there wasn't any racism in the past. It would be stupid to say such a thing. Society had bigger issues to worry about at the time, which for most families was where is the next meal coming from, and do we have enough money to pay the rent, pay the bills, and buy clothes and food for the family. Kids had paper routes, did odd jobs in the neighbourhood. I remember delivering papers and then returning to customers to cut their lawns. I remember being in tears delivering papers on a winter's morning because I was so cold. To be honest, I don't think anyone in the middle class or lower class had the time to consider racism because everyone was too busy trying to survive in a country where exploitation was often seen as the norm.
As well, how many communities in Canada had a coloured population? Most towns and villages in rural Canada didn't have people of colour and if they did, there were very few. Kids didn't consider racism like they are being told in today's society. Racism wasn't thought of, these were just people like us. It wasn't until the 1960's that we heard of racism the United States, and didn't realize that it was here in Canada as well but to a lesser degree.
The release of movies like "To Sir With Love, Guess Who's Coming to Dinner? and TV shows like Archie Bunker, Samford and Sons'" did we come to understand that something was going on. We were safe in our part of Canada. We were too busy trying to survive, but at the same time we were being made aware that something was going on and we needed to understand it.
I believe that if we knew back in the 1950's what we know now, yes there have been a very different kind of society, But we didn't. To make people look back with today's understanding and knowledge doesn't serve any purpose of the reality going on today. What is happening today is the disenfranchising people from where they are, by race. We wonder at the backlash being served by many people. There is a need to understand that when a person is disenfranchised from their society, there is bound to be a reaction and often times that reaction is done because the person has no idea as to where they are in society. Their once felt safe, and are now being threatened, which can only bring about a reaction where the individual lashes out.
It seems, that BLM and their communist revolution agenda have been able to manipulate that disenfranchising to obtain the results that they want.
Wednesday, 22 July 2020
What Kind of World are We Creating?
The pandemic of covin-19 has established a new order of society. The creation of the policies and expectations of as created by politicians and so called health officials have created a society whereby everything we once knew to be normal are no longer acceptable.
Since March of 2020, society has been changed. This is equivalent to a revolution in which the very essence of society has been changed. Even though this revolution has been bloodless, it has affected every person without exception, psychologically.
The demands made by governments have produced isolation, fears, and emotional difficulties because of these demands. The demand for isolating oneself from society and even family for 14 days, has caused many to refrain from even coming close to each other, even within the family.
Some parents have refused to allow their children to play outside with other children. These parents have made sure that their children play in the back yard with no other persons but immediate family members. Some people has also forbidden relatives from socializing with other family members and even close friends. These episodes of extended isolation has created a social structure of mistrust of and from everyone.
The wearing of masks when in public surroundings, you can see the fear in many a person's eyes as they don't want to come near you even if they are still six feet apart from each other. Governments has insisted that everyone wear a mask, that everyone wear a mask and even cloves when shopping or going out in public. These requirements will not be changed. The wearing of a mask will be and is a permanent requirement every time someone interacts with the public.
The result is that the children are being turned into paranoid people. The paranoia will create a society where no one is trusted at all, no one will hug each other, where hand shakes will be a thing of the past and only an elbow bump will be the sign of accomplishment or greeting. We are entering into the possibility that human touching will become strange and foreign. People will no longer look at each other with any type of physical contact.
The wearing of the mask will hide any smile or lack of smile from the person or persons coming in contact with each other. I have already experienced people who are wearing masks and are basically emotionless because there is no showing of the emotion that we are used to seeing.
Humans depend on physical contact, emotional contact, visual connections, and the joy of seeing someone they know. The desire to hug is now unknowingly forbidden. The opportunity to touch someone has been shunned by governments and health officials. The "social distancing" has created an atmosphere of fear of being close.
Churches have been instructed that no one is to sing and that worship is confined to less that 50 people and that everyone has to be instructed where to sit so that there is six feet around each person. Even in social clubs like the Lions Club and so on, can not have more than 50 people or less attend the meeting.
Families are told to refrain from family gatherings, even if these gatherings are outside. Only ten people are allowed to be in a personal circle of family or friends but not both and not being in one group and then another group. Technically, if you are in a group of ten, you are to stay with that group and only that group. Humans are social beings that require socializing with many people and not just a group of ten. As a result the field of contact is now manipulated.
There are now snitch lines whereby people can report their neighbours, report gatherings, report churches and social clubs if the requirements are violated. A society of informants has been established. Even the reporting of a family in a park have been reported. So if you're not wearing a mask, someone can report you and you can be charged.
Stores have refused to use money and have told customers that only a debit card or credit card is to be used. In many stores where you could get cash back, now tell customers if you want cash you go to the bank and get it. The store will no longer give cash back on debit cards. All this is fear that the virus lingers on the surfaces of everything and anything.
So what has been created? What is being developed? What is being expected? How do people look upon each other now?
Tuesday, 21 July 2020
Irish Slaves
The Irish slave trade began when 30,000 Irish prisoners were sold as slaves to the New World. The King James I Proclamation of 1625 required Irish political prisoners be sent overseas and sold to English settlers in the West Indies. By the mid 1600s, the Irish were the main slaves sold to Antigua and Montserrat. At that time, 70% of the total population of Montserrat were Irish slaves.
Ireland quickly became the biggest source of human livestock for English merchants. The majority of the early slaves to the New World were actually white.
From 1641 to 1652, over 500,000 Irish were killed by the English and another 300,000 were sold as slaves. Ireland’s population fell from about 1,500,000 to 600,000 in one single decade. Families were ripped apart as the British did not allow Irish dads to take their wives and children with them across the Atlantic. This led to a helpless population of homeless women and children. Britain’s solution was to auction them off as well.
During the 1650s, over 100,000 Irish children between the ages of 10 and 14 were taken from their parents and sold as slaves in the West Indies, Virginia and New England. In this decade, 52,000 Irish (mostly women and children) were sold to Barbados and Virginia. Another 30,000 Irish men and women were also transported and sold to the highest bidder. In 1656, Cromwell ordered that 2000 Irish children be taken to Jamaica and sold as slaves to English settlers.
Many people today will avoid calling the Irish slaves what they truly were: Slaves. They’ll come up with terms like “Indentured Servants” to describe what occurred to the Irish. However, in most cases from the 17th and 18th centuries, Irish slaves were nothing more than human cattle.
As an example, the African slave trade was just beginning during this same period. It is well recorded that African slaves, not tainted with the stain of the hated Catholic theology and more expensive to purchase, were often treated far better than their Irish counterparts.
African slaves were very expensive during the late 1600s (50 Sterling). Irish slaves came cheap (no more than 5 Sterling). If a planter whipped or branded or beat an Irish slave to death, it was never a crime. A death was a monetary setback, but far cheaper than killing a more expensive African. The English masters quickly began breeding the Irish women for both their own personal pleasure and for greater profit. Children of slaves were themselves slaves, which increased the size of the master’s free workforce. Even if an Irish woman somehow obtained her freedom, her kids would remain slaves of her master. Thus, Irish moms, even with this new found emancipation, would seldom abandon their kids and would remain in servitude.
In time, the English thought of a better way to use these women (in many cases, girls as young as 12) to increase their market share: The settlers began to breed Irish women and girls with African men to produce slaves with a distinct complexion. These new “mulatto” slaves brought a higher price than Irish livestock and, likewise, enabled the settlers to save money rather than purchase new African slaves. This practice of interbreeding Irish females with African men went on for several decades and was so widespread that, in 1681, legislation was passed “forbidding the practice of mating Irish slave women to African slave men for the purpose of producing slaves for sale.” In short, it was stopped only because it interfered with the profits of a large slave transport company.
England continued to ship tens of thousands of Irish slaves for more than a century. Records state that, after the 1798 Irish Rebellion, thousands of Irish slaves were sold to both America and Australia. There were horrible abuses of both African and Irish captives. One British ship even dumped 1,302 slaves into the Atlantic Ocean so that the crew would have plenty of food to eat.
There is little question that the Irish experienced the horrors of slavery as much (if not more in the 17th Century) as the Africans did. There is, also, very little question that those brown, tanned faces you witness in your travels to the West Indies are very likely a combination of African and Irish ancestry. In 1839, Britain finally decided on its own to end its participation in Satan’s highway to hell and stopped transporting slaves. While their decision did not stop pirates from doing what they desired, the new law slowly concluded THIS chapter of nightmarish Irish misery.
But, if anyone, black or white, believes that slavery was only an African experience, then they’ve got it completely wrong.
Irish slavery is a subject worth remembering, not erasing from our memories.
Monday, 20 July 2020
BLM and their cultural revolution
The latest in demands in a scale of social cancelation of a previous culture, BLM leaders are demanding that the people being charged for the vandalism of a monument on the grounds of Queens Park in Toronto, have claimed victory and therefore demand the release of the vandals claiming they did nothing wrong.
But that is not what is important. BLM have changed their focus from racism to cultural revolution whereby they are making demands and expecting that everyone will support them. In the interviews that the media are so anxious to give these buys their utmost attention, fail to really hear what is being said.
In the photo above, the gentleman on the left in the picture said "defund the police, dissolve the police". Their expectation to their demands is that the governments will dissolve all police services through out the country. At first they wanted body cams on all the officers. The idea was that these body cams would prove to the country how racist the police officers were. Then after realizing that the body cams would show the whole truth about altercations and what lead up to the altercations, they quickly changed their minds. Why you may ask, and rightly so. The body cams would show what the BLM don't want people to know -- that there was a reason for the police stopping the person in the first place and then expose the truth that police officers are not systemic racists like BLM wants everyone to believe.
The other point is that the want total dissolvement of all police services, but never offered anything in return. Once they realized they had to offer something in return, BLM now says that only white police officers be terminated from their jobs. So lets be honest here and I mean totally honest.
The actions of the BLM fall inline with the philosophies and theories of revolutions as expressed and demonstrated by Marx, Lenin, and a cultural purging as practiced by Mao Tse Tung in the Chinese cultural revolution which completely canceled the history of Chia and rewrote it to match the teachings of Mao. This is the systemic racism of BLM and it is now coming for the surface.
Racism is the fashion statement of the BLM, but the reality is the revolutionary purge and complete racial purification as BLM see it in accordance with their doctrines of Marxist to Maoist teachings. And yes I am right. When you hear the BLM speakers make their statements, their philosophy is systemic racism, which what they claim that only white people can be.
The BLM is only concerned when a white police officer has a confrontation with a black person and the BLM are able to use the altercation to prove their arguments. What they don't want anyone to know is the Black on Black altercations, which are ten times higher than white on Black altercations. Since there are and is political designs being created, BLM has now stepped in to the very boxes that they don't want to be in. The first box is their own systemic racism. The second box is their cancelation policies of the present society and culture. The third box is the fact that the leaders are following the communist teachings of Marx, Linin, and Mao. The fourth box is that they have allowed the politicians to own and control racism and in so doing have allowed the politicians to remove racism from their control.
Saturday, 18 July 2020
Have We Become Too Sanitized?
This morning I was thinking of this very question and with good reason. We have been told in the past that hospitals are the perfect breeding grounds for bacteria to develop because of the sanitization done daily in the hospitals. We were told how clean surfaces were new breeding grounds for bacteria because the previous bacteria was wiped away.
Now we are being told to sanitize the surfaces in our homes, our cars, our stores and the list goes on and on. I was in Food Basics in Simcoe, and the cashier moves from one cash register to the one next to it so the one just used is wiped down. The cashier moves back and forth. In Walmart, the cashiers will take five customers, than move to another cash area so that a cleaner can wipe down the cash area. As you walk into stores, all the shopping carts have been wiped down and cleaned, and all cash areas or counter areas where customers come in contact with a store clerk, there are plexy-glass barriers set up -- ridiculously called "spit guards".
Now think upon this point. After so many years of being told that hospitals are breeding grounds for bacteria, we are now being told that all the surfaces we use must be and should be wiped clean as often as possible so the bacteria is cleared away and the surface is clean as if it were a hospital. Think upon that one for awhile. Let the logic sink in and float around in your head.
People drive to cleaning centers, get out of their cars, let a cleaning person wipe down the surfaces in their car and sanitize the car. The the person gets back into their cleaned car with the same ungloved hands they drove up to the center with, and drive away. What common sense has prevailed here? What doesn't the person understand? They get their vehicle cleaned and get back in and the bacteria they left their vehicle with is now back in only on a cleaner surface making it more habitable for bacteria to grow even faster.
As we sanitize, we are creating new breeding grounds for bacteria to develop. This point or fact was born out years ago when it was discovered that hospitals were so clean that they were the perfect space to breed bacteria. Now we have ignored that fact or point and have transferred it to our own homes and vehicles and everywhere else. The reality of a clean surface is not there and never was there. This is why I keep saying that we are being ruled by fear and that that fear is being perpetuated by the government and news medias.
If we really want a clean surface, we must be cleaning constantly every few minutes. It is not practical. We fail to allow our immune systems to effectively work the way they are suppose to work. We have been made into a society that fears each other, that fears going outside, that fears to be in their own space.
Now we are being told to sanitize the surfaces in our homes, our cars, our stores and the list goes on and on. I was in Food Basics in Simcoe, and the cashier moves from one cash register to the one next to it so the one just used is wiped down. The cashier moves back and forth. In Walmart, the cashiers will take five customers, than move to another cash area so that a cleaner can wipe down the cash area. As you walk into stores, all the shopping carts have been wiped down and cleaned, and all cash areas or counter areas where customers come in contact with a store clerk, there are plexy-glass barriers set up -- ridiculously called "spit guards".
Now think upon this point. After so many years of being told that hospitals are breeding grounds for bacteria, we are now being told that all the surfaces we use must be and should be wiped clean as often as possible so the bacteria is cleared away and the surface is clean as if it were a hospital. Think upon that one for awhile. Let the logic sink in and float around in your head.
People drive to cleaning centers, get out of their cars, let a cleaning person wipe down the surfaces in their car and sanitize the car. The the person gets back into their cleaned car with the same ungloved hands they drove up to the center with, and drive away. What common sense has prevailed here? What doesn't the person understand? They get their vehicle cleaned and get back in and the bacteria they left their vehicle with is now back in only on a cleaner surface making it more habitable for bacteria to grow even faster.
As we sanitize, we are creating new breeding grounds for bacteria to develop. This point or fact was born out years ago when it was discovered that hospitals were so clean that they were the perfect space to breed bacteria. Now we have ignored that fact or point and have transferred it to our own homes and vehicles and everywhere else. The reality of a clean surface is not there and never was there. This is why I keep saying that we are being ruled by fear and that that fear is being perpetuated by the government and news medias.
If we really want a clean surface, we must be cleaning constantly every few minutes. It is not practical. We fail to allow our immune systems to effectively work the way they are suppose to work. We have been made into a society that fears each other, that fears going outside, that fears to be in their own space.
Friday, 17 July 2020
Is Canada the place to be?
A friend of mine sent me some photos of well armed American citizens with the caption, "The average American has had enough." At first I was not surprised to see the photos as this has been the main theme of the political left, the politically correct, and the progressive left liberals to disarm Americans. Let's be honest, Americans have been seen as a deadly society. The reality though is only one sided, meaning that the media must take the responsibility for over emphasizing an armed population when more people are killed in car accidents, suicides, old age, health issues and knives far more than guns, and yet guns are being depicted as the major cause of death in the United States.
The reporting continues in that since the covid-19 virus as appeared, and combined with that the cancelation movement (those that wish to destroy history), black lives matter etc. that gun sales in the United States has more than risen by 200% and that most of these guns are being purchased by females. As a result, Canadians and many other western cultures do not understand the ability of the American people to have the right to self protection, protection of property, and the right to carry a weapon. This concept is foreign and not understood by many outside the United States.
The Second Amendment that gives the American people the right to "bare arms" is enshrined in the history that made the country from the very beginning. The right to bare arms is not only entrenched in the Constitution of the United States, but also in the Declaration of Independence that began the war for independence and the revolution against the British rule. One can not therefore separate the Declaration of Independence from the Constitution of the United States as the two are intertwined.
The revolutionary philosophies that were developed to establish the United States were new at the time. These philosophical theories at the time were new and never used in the creation of any other country, nor were these same philosophies used to create new governments as one would expect with the French Revolution. The idea that the people have come together to form a country has never been done before nor have they been used since 1776. The idea that "the people of a nation, are the source of authority to give a government the permission to lead the people collectively as a country, has never been done anywhere else in the world.
In Canada, the constitution is nothing more than a piece of legislation that needed to be passed not so much by the country of Canada at the time, but needed to be passed by the British Parliament to give the colonies in North America an opportunity to come together to form a union of sorts for the purpose of trade, protection, and good government. Nowhere are the people made part of the Canadian Constitution (the British North American Act 1867 and The Constitution Act of 1983). The people are considered nothing more than occupants of the colonies to be ruled over by another form of government.
The Canadian Human Rights Code never came into being until sometime in the 1950's and was never enshrined in the Canadian Constitution. The Canadian Bill of Rights is only a piece of legislation that has been attached to the legislation that creates Canada and can be amended or repealed at anytime by the government in power at the time. The government of Canada is not Parliament like one would expect, but rather the government of Canada is the executive power which is made up of the Prime Minister and the Cabinet.
Unlike the Constitution of the United States, Canada's constitution is not written in stone. It can be changed at anytime by any government that sees fit to open the legislation and change what ever section in part or the whole that the executive branch decides. The people have nothing to say about it. They can protest or argue but in reality it is the executive branch of the government that has the final say.
Is Canada the place to be? That is up to the individual that wants to live in this country. On the other side of the coin, the United States is still a country where people want to flock to, believing that they can make a better life for themselves. Canada is a country that has "profited" in some ways to the American Dream, but have not been able to create the atmosphere that is present in the United States.
People can not protect themselves in Canada, nor can they protect their property, by the use of lethal force. By law, a person can only use as much force as is being used against him/her self. And even that has come under fire and seen as excessive force.
People may believe that Canada is a more peaceful country, and it likely is. At the same time, there is a deep misconception that the people of Canada give the authority to lead the country to Parliament. The people do not. The people can only elected a chosen representative of the party that does not represent the constituency in Parliament, but rather represents the party to the constituents. Once more, the people are an inconvenient presence that gives credence but not authority to the government to lead the nation. This leading the nation is also questionable as often times Canadians have found the government to rule that nation instead of leading the nation.
So the question Is Canada the place to be is only determined by the person who contemplated the question.
The reporting continues in that since the covid-19 virus as appeared, and combined with that the cancelation movement (those that wish to destroy history), black lives matter etc. that gun sales in the United States has more than risen by 200% and that most of these guns are being purchased by females. As a result, Canadians and many other western cultures do not understand the ability of the American people to have the right to self protection, protection of property, and the right to carry a weapon. This concept is foreign and not understood by many outside the United States.
The Second Amendment that gives the American people the right to "bare arms" is enshrined in the history that made the country from the very beginning. The right to bare arms is not only entrenched in the Constitution of the United States, but also in the Declaration of Independence that began the war for independence and the revolution against the British rule. One can not therefore separate the Declaration of Independence from the Constitution of the United States as the two are intertwined.
The revolutionary philosophies that were developed to establish the United States were new at the time. These philosophical theories at the time were new and never used in the creation of any other country, nor were these same philosophies used to create new governments as one would expect with the French Revolution. The idea that the people have come together to form a country has never been done before nor have they been used since 1776. The idea that "the people of a nation, are the source of authority to give a government the permission to lead the people collectively as a country, has never been done anywhere else in the world.
In Canada, the constitution is nothing more than a piece of legislation that needed to be passed not so much by the country of Canada at the time, but needed to be passed by the British Parliament to give the colonies in North America an opportunity to come together to form a union of sorts for the purpose of trade, protection, and good government. Nowhere are the people made part of the Canadian Constitution (the British North American Act 1867 and The Constitution Act of 1983). The people are considered nothing more than occupants of the colonies to be ruled over by another form of government.
The Canadian Human Rights Code never came into being until sometime in the 1950's and was never enshrined in the Canadian Constitution. The Canadian Bill of Rights is only a piece of legislation that has been attached to the legislation that creates Canada and can be amended or repealed at anytime by the government in power at the time. The government of Canada is not Parliament like one would expect, but rather the government of Canada is the executive power which is made up of the Prime Minister and the Cabinet.
Unlike the Constitution of the United States, Canada's constitution is not written in stone. It can be changed at anytime by any government that sees fit to open the legislation and change what ever section in part or the whole that the executive branch decides. The people have nothing to say about it. They can protest or argue but in reality it is the executive branch of the government that has the final say.
Is Canada the place to be? That is up to the individual that wants to live in this country. On the other side of the coin, the United States is still a country where people want to flock to, believing that they can make a better life for themselves. Canada is a country that has "profited" in some ways to the American Dream, but have not been able to create the atmosphere that is present in the United States.
People can not protect themselves in Canada, nor can they protect their property, by the use of lethal force. By law, a person can only use as much force as is being used against him/her self. And even that has come under fire and seen as excessive force.
People may believe that Canada is a more peaceful country, and it likely is. At the same time, there is a deep misconception that the people of Canada give the authority to lead the country to Parliament. The people do not. The people can only elected a chosen representative of the party that does not represent the constituency in Parliament, but rather represents the party to the constituents. Once more, the people are an inconvenient presence that gives credence but not authority to the government to lead the nation. This leading the nation is also questionable as often times Canadians have found the government to rule that nation instead of leading the nation.
So the question Is Canada the place to be is only determined by the person who contemplated the question.
Sunday, 12 July 2020
The more things go on, the more I have a very strong feeling that the end of the church age is here and that we are even closer to the "end of time" as we know it as followers of God.
The Jews are looking for their messiah, while the Christians are looking for the return of Jesus, whom Christians claim to be the messiah. At this point I don't think it really matters. The writings of both the old and new testaments have announce a return and as we are looking at the future through glasses we have aquired, there is little doubt that God's plan is coming once more into play and we need to be ready and watchfull of His coming.
Tuesday, 7 July 2020
WOW - a good read found on facebook to a Canadian senator
Too good and true not to pass on!!!
PISSED AS HELL:
WOW!! This is too good not to pass it on. I don't think “pissed" really covers it!!!!
WOW!! This is too good not to pass it on. I don't think “pissed" really covers it!!!!
She uses some pretty strong language in her commentary.I know how she feels on this point. Too bad that all of us "easy going" Canadians couldn't hire this lady to be our leader and then we would all storm Parliament Hill with torches aflame.
Smith, the Senator from Québec calls senior citizens the Greediest Generation as he compared "Social Security " to a Milk Cow with over a million teats.
Here's a response in a letter from PATTY JOHNSTONE in Ontario ... I think she is a little ticked off! She also tells it like it is!
Oh sooo true!
"Hey Larry, let's get a few things straight!!!!!
1. As a career politician, you have been on the public dole (tit) for FIFTY YEARS.
2. I have been paying CPP & OHIP for 48 YEARS (since I was 15 years old. I am now 63).
3. My Canada Pension payments, and those of millions of other Canadians, were safely tucked away in an interest bearing account for decades until you political pukes decided to raid the account and give OUR money to a bunch of zero losers in return for votes, thus bankrupting the system and turning Social Security into a Ponzi scheme that would make Bernie Madoff proud.
4. Recently, just like Lucy & Charlie Brown, you and "your ilk" pulled the proverbial football away from millions of Canadian seniors nearing retirement and moved the goalposts for full retirement from age 65 to age, 67. NOW, you and your "shill commission" are proposing to move the goalposts YET AGAIN.
5. I, and millions of other Canadians, have been paying into
OHIP & CPP from Day One, and now "you morons" propose to change the rules of the game. Why? Because "you idiots" mismanaged other parts of the economy to such an extent that you need to steal our money from OHIP & CPP to pay the bills.
OHIP & CPP from Day One, and now "you morons" propose to change the rules of the game. Why? Because "you idiots" mismanaged other parts of the economy to such an extent that you need to steal our money from OHIP & CPP to pay the bills.
6. I, and millions of other Canadians, have been paying income taxes our entire lives, and now you propose to increase our taxes yet again.
Why? Because you "incompetent bastards" spent our money so profligately that you just kept on spending even after you ran out of money. Now, you come to the Canadian taxpayers and say you need more to pay off YOUR debt.
To add insult to injury, you label us "greedy" for calling "bullshit" to your incompetence. Well, Captain Bullshit, I have a few questions for YOU:
1. How much money have you earned from the Canadian taxpayers during your pathetic 50-year political career?
2. At what age did you retire from your pathetic political career,and how much are you receiving in annual retirement benefits from the Canadian taxpayers?
3. How much do you pay for YOUR government provided health insurance?
4. What cuts in YOUR retirement and healthcare benefits are you proposing in your disgusting deficit reduction proposal, or as usual,have you exempted yourself and your political cronies?
It is you, Captain Bullshit, and your political co-conspirators called Parliament who are the "greedy" ones. It is you and your fellow nutcase thieves who have bankrupted the Canadian Pension, OHIP and stolen the Canadian dream from millions of loyal, patriotic taxpayers.
And for what? Votes and your job and retirement security at our expense, you lunk-headed, leech.
That's right, sir. You and yours have bankrupted our benefits for the sole purpose of advancing your pathetic, political careers. You know it, we know it, and you know that we know it.
And you can take that to the bank, you miserable son of a bitch.
P.S. And stop calling CPP & OHIP "entitlements". WHAT AN INSULT!!!!
I have been paying in to the CPP system for 45 years "It's my money"- give it back to me the way the system was designed and stop patting yourself on the back like you are being generous by doling out these monthly check
EVERYONE!!!
If you like the way things are in Canada delete this.
If you like the way things are in Canada delete this.
If you agree with what an Ontario citizen, says, please. PASS IT ON!!!!
Are We Loosing Our Perspectives?
Many of my thoughts are a result of my observations that I have seen and read. There are times I want to just turn off the television and anything else that has opinions or news reporting. I have become suspicious of news media outlets here in Canada, as the liberal party and the liber government under Trudeau have paid off the media to the tune of six hundred million dollars. As a result of this so called funding, the news is slanted in favour of Trudeau and his band of merry spenders.
There is enough corruption with in the liberal party and the liberal government that any amount of trust given is soon questioned and walked away from. We know that nothing anti-Trudeau or liberal will not be reported, and if it is, it is very very short lived.
Like the huge protest in Ottawa over the July 1st celebrations of Canada's 153 year of confederation. didn't even make a ripple with the news agencies through out Canada and yet, and yet a 191 page document given to the FBI agent at the American Embassy in Ottawa didn't even make a sub head line. Oh wait, yes. One small news agency did report that a massive crowd arrived at the U.S. Embassy and chanted "Fuck Trudeau". That was it. Nothing else and nothing more.
Let's be honest. If a 191 page document was handed over accusing a conservative government of certain events, all hell would have broken out for weeks reporting the contents of this affidavit. But because it was concerning Trudeau, not a whisper was made. It was like it never happened.
Now lets bring the observation up to date. Trudeau has announced that he will not go the meeting at the White House with President Trump and Mexican President. He claims he has an important caucus meeting to attend this weekend and he deems more important. He's also using the covid-19 virus as another reason in case the previous one isn't good enough. Now let me throw this conspiracy theory in for laughs, What if Trudeau knew what was in the 191 page document, which possibly has linked him to an assassination plot to kill President Trump, would it not be difficult in a private meeting to be put on the spot? It would be safer for Trudeau to stay here where its safe, than go to Washington where he may be put on the spot. That is just a thought.
As you can see, my observation has little to do with perspectives, and more of what we choose to see.
There is enough corruption with in the liberal party and the liberal government that any amount of trust given is soon questioned and walked away from. We know that nothing anti-Trudeau or liberal will not be reported, and if it is, it is very very short lived.
Like the huge protest in Ottawa over the July 1st celebrations of Canada's 153 year of confederation. didn't even make a ripple with the news agencies through out Canada and yet, and yet a 191 page document given to the FBI agent at the American Embassy in Ottawa didn't even make a sub head line. Oh wait, yes. One small news agency did report that a massive crowd arrived at the U.S. Embassy and chanted "Fuck Trudeau". That was it. Nothing else and nothing more.
Let's be honest. If a 191 page document was handed over accusing a conservative government of certain events, all hell would have broken out for weeks reporting the contents of this affidavit. But because it was concerning Trudeau, not a whisper was made. It was like it never happened.
Now lets bring the observation up to date. Trudeau has announced that he will not go the meeting at the White House with President Trump and Mexican President. He claims he has an important caucus meeting to attend this weekend and he deems more important. He's also using the covid-19 virus as another reason in case the previous one isn't good enough. Now let me throw this conspiracy theory in for laughs, What if Trudeau knew what was in the 191 page document, which possibly has linked him to an assassination plot to kill President Trump, would it not be difficult in a private meeting to be put on the spot? It would be safer for Trudeau to stay here where its safe, than go to Washington where he may be put on the spot. That is just a thought.
As you can see, my observation has little to do with perspectives, and more of what we choose to see.
Saturday, 4 July 2020
Another July 1st has gone by, and now July 4th is on it's way out as well. This year there have been some big differences that only the governments came be blamed for. In Canada, especially in the province of Ontario, fireworks displays were cancelled all across the province. In fact a fire ban was put into place so that people would be forced no to consider buying fireworks. In some municipalities stores that sole fireworks were told to close. So as Canada first celebrations faded away without a whimper, our American friends are on the road to huge displays as usual.
The difference between the two nations is as different as apples and oranges. Both nations were created differently and contain different political institutions that have marked the difference between the two nations and have developed into two individual cultures. However, the difference between the two nations is something that a lot of people don't understand, let alone know about.
The Canadian Fathers of Confederation believed in accepting without hesitation the institutions of Britain. In fact the Father of Confederation had no intention of really separating from Britain and had decided that the loyalty to the crown was paramount in establishing Canada as a country.
One of the main reasons for developing a country is because the two colonies Canada West (Ontario) and Canada East (Quebec) needed the inclusion of at least two colonies (New Brunswick and Nova Scotia) to end the continual stalemates in the two Canadas.
While the Americans were deep in their civil war, Canada didn't want the same kind of government for fear that as a nation, Canada would eventually end up the same. While the American constitution begins with "We the people.." the Canadian constitution is a piece of British legislation giving the ability of the four colonies to unite as one "nation" loosely. The people were not considered as having the ability to exercise political knowhow and abilities, which in the views of the Fathers of Confederation the common person wasn't part of the "elite" educated and land owning members of society -- the Canadian upper class.
Canada became a colonial country, adapting British political philosophies, which included British institutions that best served Britain and had very little to do with Canada and the vast regions and differences between the regions.
This is just a part of the Canadian history that is often excluded from education studies.
Friday, 3 July 2020
Putin -- The Czar of all the Russias
Putin has seen the passage of changes to the Russian constitution that will allow him to be president of Russia until 2030s or so.
This basically makes him elected dictator of Russia, something that Canada is very familiar with every time Canadians vote in a majority government.
The difference here is that Putin has obtained the changes, but it will not necessarily dismiss him as dictator or even "Czar" of Russia. What this does is it gives him room to manouver himself to become just that, before his terms in office are finished.
Ever since this man came to power I was weary of him and saw him crave the power that he now has, but he is not finished. He will become Czar as it may seem until he dies. That is what he wants and even though everyone can see it, no one has the ability nor the desire at the present time to oppose him and challenge him in any election that may take place.
It is not a fare comparison, but it seems that as long as the average Russian has a bottle of Vodka in one hand and some domestic live stock in the other to "fuck", the average Russian is content to wallow in his own shit and not care who runs the country.
As I say, it's not a fare thing to say, but it seems to be true, and can be applied to the apathy of many nations including Canada, and even the United States. Not a fare statelment, but it appears to be so true when it comes to the apathy seen as election time.
Wednesday, 1 July 2020
2020 - the year of the cluster fuck.
this seems to be the best way to reflect on 2020.
we have been ruled by leftist groups and organizations, ruled by governments that have not just infringed on our civil liberties, but have actually accomplished the develop a frame work by which governments at will can completely castrate society and no one appears to be none the wiser.
Canadians are known for their laid back, apologetic way of life. It has shown itself with all the stuff that has happened so far this year, and it's only half over. Where will all of this lead us? So far it hasn't lead us in the right direction.
The black lives matter organization is following the floor plan as laid down by Carl Marx and Lenin, and not to forget Mao Ste Tung. The total destruction of society and culture inorder to create and replace it with a new world order is the only agenda of the blm organization. They have left the cause of ill treatment and injustice and are pursuing their true agenda which is a new world order based the communist manifesto.
Then you have the thugs of the Antifa or anti-fascist organization. They are the Brown Shirts of the Nazi party. They are the Black Shirts of the Italian Fascist party. They are the thugs that have made sure looting and rioting are taking place. They despise peaceful demonstrations and if need by they create the conditions to begin the riots and looting including starting it themselves.
Meanwhile, with all this going on, main stream media like the CBC and CTV and the Toronto Star and others, blindly show support for these groups. They look for the best story to interview that proves the points being used to justify the insane actions of destruction and shut downs including changing names of cities, streets, and tearing down and vandalizing statues.
History is being ignored to satisfy so called offensive ideologies that have no baring on the present day. If they are allowing a 500 to 1000 year old history to bother them, they in reality they need psychiatric help. This is 2020 and people are still allowing Christopher Columbus to affect their present day lives. How ridiculous.
This however, seems to be the mentality of the left. They don't see the history, they don't want to see the history, they only look at what they regard as offensive to justify their rampage of stupidity. And what is worse is that those who should know better are so intent on creating a new world order of Marxist communism, that they ignore the truths and realities, that have helped to steer a course that will bring the needed changes and develop a better world in which to live.
The political and social progressive left have vandalized and castrated society. They have used this covid-19 pandemic to exercise their hatred towards the general populations, and to justify the introduction of their new world order knowing that the normality wished for by the population will not be there once all this pandemic is allowed to be concluded.
In Canada, universities professors have been told that normality will not happen and this pandemic normality will continue indefinitely. The prime minster has come out from the very beginning of this pandemic, announcing that it won't be until 2022 when Canada will be seeing any light at the end of the tunnel. And of course he is using this pandemic for his own agenda which is to rule Canada without parliament and find ways and means by which parliament remains non-functional.
We are living in a world where all of western culture is being destroyed. We are living in a world where what was normal will no longer be. We are living in a world where life is cheep and the revolutionary new world order will be replacing what was. The unfortunate way out of this is almost a civil war developing in many countries around the world. When the silent majority has had enough, and a leader rises from the ashes of what has been destroyed, the worst will be created and under the excuse of law and order, we all will suffer the consequences.
The world health organization is already bringing fear with new viruses and pandemics. The United Nations is nothing more than the stepping stones for the Muslim Brotherhood, who's only design is an Islamic world order where by all religions will be abolished except for Islam and its barbarism that has not changed since the 700s AD. These are all warnings of what may be coming down the line once this new world order has created its monstrosity of destruction.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)






